Stetlar v. Nellis
New York Supreme Court
MOTION" by the plaintiff to set aside an inquisition in an action for assault and battery, in which the plaintiff obtained a verdict for six cents damages.
1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.
This motion is based upon two grounds: 1st. That a man duly summoned as a juror was discharged, by the sheriff at the private suggestion of the defendant; and, 2d. That evidence was improperly received, of provocation given by the plaintiff a long time prior to the assault which was the subject of the action.
The first ground is not sustained by the evidence. The sheriff testifies that Conklin, the person referred to, was not summoned as a juror, and that no request or suggestion was made by the defendant, or his attorney, that he should be discharged or that he should not be summoned; and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lee v. WoolseyNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- Richardson v. NorthrupNew York Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Dolan v. FaganNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- Genung v. BaldwinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902