Weber v. Schergens
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Hon. Amos M. Thayer, Judge. (1) The plaintiff has proved everything that need be proved to warrant a recovery qn the tax bill. (2) The original assessment and the original tax bill based thereon were .null and void. Weber v. Sehergens, 59 Mo. 389 ; Wee-nan v. Smith, 60 Mo. 292 ; s. c., 50 Mo. 523 ; CHty v. Olemens, 49 Mo. 552; Morley n.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Hon. Amos M. Thayer, Judge. (1) The plaintiff has proved everything that need be proved to warrant a recovery qn the tax bill. (2) The original assessment and the original tax bill based thereon were .null and void. Weber v. Sehergens, 59 Mo. 389 ; Wee-nan v. Smith, 60 Mo. 292 ; s. c., 50 Mo. 523 ; CHty v. Olemens, 49 Mo. 552; Morley n. WeaTcley, 86 Mo. 455; Farrar v. City, 80 Mo. 394. (3) The original assessment and original bill being void, the president of the board of public improvements had the power to issue to the contractor a new special tax…
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This was an action upon a special tax bill. A trial before the judge, sitting as a jury, resulted in a judgment for the defendants. The ground on which this judgment was rendered was the following state of facts, which stands admitted: That in the year 1869, a special tax bill was issued for the work and against the property named in the present tax bill; that an action was brought thereon against two of the parties who are defendants in the present action, and a judgment recovered therein in the circuit court, which, in 1875, was reversed by the Supreme Court and remanded to the circuit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farrar v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Neenan v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Eyermann v. ProvenchereMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
- First National Bank v. ArnoldiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Eyerman v. BlakesleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wetmore v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Mason v. Kansas City Belt Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Galbreath v. NewtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- City of Higginsville Ex Rel. Kasco, Inc. v. Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gallaher v. BartlettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896