Legal Opinion

Gallaher v. Bartlett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1896Published

Appeal from the Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. A. M. Woodson, Judge. (1) No cause of action is stated. The work was to be done according to ordinance 1655 and is alleged to have been done according to another ordinance, 356, passed two years before. The several lots were not charged with their proportion of the work done on the south side, but with the work done in their immediate front. R. S. 1889, sec. 1406; Eyeman v. Hardy, 8 Mo. App. 312; Galbreath v. Newton, 30 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. A. M. Woodson, Judge. (1) No cause of action is stated. The work was to be done according to ordinance 1655 and is alleged to have been done according to another ordinance, 356, passed two years before. The several lots were not charged with their proportion of the work done on the south side, but with the work done in their immediate front. R. S. 1889, sec. 1406; Eyeman v. Hardy, 8 Mo. App. 312; Galbreath v. Newton, 30 Mo. App. 391; Riley v. Stewart, 50 Mo. App. 600; King Hill, etc., v. Hamilton, 51 Mo. App. 120. (2) When the contract was read…

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

This is an action upon a special tax bill, commenced before a justice of the peace. The statement alleged that the city of St. Joseph, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of this state, by its' duly authorized officers and agents, issued and delivered to plaintiff, as contractor, a special tax bill, dated September 29, 1893, for the sum of $7.44, and that the contents of said tax bill were as follows :

‘ ‘1012. — Duplicate Special Tax Bill, for laying third-class sidewalks. City Engineer’s Office, St. Joseph, Mo., Sept. 29, 1893. — Mrs. Lucy R. Lewis to J. P. Gallaher, Dr.: To…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keith v. BinghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Neenan v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Seibert v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. First National Bank v. ArnoldiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Ess v. BoutonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API