Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Continental Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 30, 1938No. 1835PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit by The Continental Supply Company against Cecil H. Lockhart, upon an open account, for oil well casing, etc., sold by it to Lockhart, and against P. L. Hoffman for an alleged conversion of pipe sold by plaintiff to Lockhart, and upon which pipe plaintiff asserts a lien under Article 5473, R.S. 1925, as amended in 1929, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 5473.

On November 28, 1930, Humble Oil Refining Company and Lockhart entered into a contract, evidenced by a letter from the Humble Company to Lockhart, which, insofar as it is here material, is as follows:

"This will confirm an agreement…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Thomas v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Tennant v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Taylor v. Sanford, AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Thomas Trammell & Co. v. MountTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Continental Supply Co. v. HoffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. v. Heritage Consolidated, L.L.C. (In Re Heritage Consolidated, L.L.C.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Enlow v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. McCarty v. Halliburton Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1987
  5. Lane-Wells Company v. Continental-Emsco CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API