Legal Opinion
Paulson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 27, 1994No. CV 94-2691 JSLPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LETTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Boyd Paulson (“Paulson”) has sued his automobile insurance carrier, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) for breach of contract, bad faith, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and fraud arising out of State Farm’s initial refusal to cover Paulson for injuries he sustained in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of an underinsured motorist. State Farm initially denied coverage to Paulson based on medical records indicating that Paulson had recovered fully from his…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Hailey v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Peggy Troutt, Dba Little Joe's Tavern v. Colorado Western Insurance Company, Peggy Troutt, Dba Little Joe's Tavern,plaintiff-Appellant v. Colorado Western Insuran CecompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gentry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.