Legal Opinion

Doe v. Ohio University

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 27, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00858Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-00858 v. Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura OHIO UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter arises on Defendant Ohio University’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 56). Also disposed of in this opinion is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 43). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED as to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API