Legal Opinion

Huffman v. Mills

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Original Proceedings in Mandamus. The opinion, filed at the June, 1888, session of the court, contains a sufficient statement of the facts.

1Per curiam

During the year 1887, C. C. Mills' was the sheriff of Hamilton county, his term regularly expiring on *578or before the second Monday of January, 1888. At the general election held in November, 1887, A. M. Huffman was elected as his successor, the vote being as follows: For Huffman, 447; for Pascal Poe, 234; for S. J. Denson, 144; for Dan. Jones, 102; for Henry Wright, 1. This action is mandamus, brought by Huffman in this court on April 16, 1888, to compel Mills to deliver to Huffman certain property belonging to said office of sheriff. The only defense made by Mills is, that no proper canvass…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Bradford v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. PratherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. State ex rel. Roberts v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API