Doe v. County of Sonoma
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN DOE, Case No. 16-cv-05195-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 49, 56 Defendants. 11 12 13 Pro se plaintiff John Doe, who is suing under a pseudonym, has alleged a number of civil 14 rights violations related to an involuntary detention in a psychiatric hospital under the Lanterman- 15 Petris-Short Act, Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq. (the “LPS Act”). Dkt. No. 1. This order 16 resolves defendants’ motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.