Legal Opinion

Doe v. County of Sonoma

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 18, 2019No. 3:16-cv-05195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOHN DOE, Case No. 16-cv-05195-JD 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 49, 56 Defendants. 11 12 13 Pro se plaintiff John Doe, who is suing under a pseudonym, has alleged a number of civil 14 rights violations related to an involuntary detention in a psychiatric hospital under the Lanterman- 15 Petris-Short Act, Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq. (the “LPS Act”). Dkt. No. 1. This order 16 resolves defendants’ motions to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API