Wall v. Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
Plaintiff’s petition was the ordinary action on an insurance policy for the death, by accidental means, of her husband. The answer of the defendant, aside from a general denial,, pleaded in substance that, under the provisions of the policy and the law, the policy was not in force at the time of the death of the said Joseph Wall. By way of reply plaintiff pleaded first, that the company had no right to forfeit or suspend said policy, because the notice provided for in section 8959 of the Code was not given in the manner prescribed by said section and at no time did the defendant ever give…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sherwood v. Home Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Rindskoff Bros. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- A. M. Dillow & Co. v. City of MonticelloSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Bowell v. DraperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Bradford v. Homestead Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glidewell, Admin. v. Arkhola Sand Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Des Moines Blue Ribbon Distributors, Inc. v. Drewrys Ltd. U. S. A.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Ballagh v. Polk-Warren Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Wall v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Smith v. Alaskan Fur CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.