Legal Opinion
Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Dow Jones & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 28, 1990No. 90 C 7031PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HART, District Judge.
Plaintiff Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 (the “Union”) represents 17 employees of defendant Dow Jones & Company, Inc.’s (the “Journal”) Naperville, Illinois facility. That facility produces the Midwest Edition of the Wall Street Journal and the Union’s members work in the facility’s composing room. The employees work under a collective bargaining agreement dated June 19, 1987 (the “Agreement”) which expired December 31, 1989, but remains in effect pending negotiations (which have been underway for more than a year) or other action.1 In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local Lodge No. 1266, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Panoramic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Rozay's Transfer v. Local Freight Drivers, Local 208, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- International Association of MacHinists Etc. v. Howmet Corporation, Menasco Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 245 v. FirstEnergy Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002