Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Schneider

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County

Decided September 20, 1938No. 252Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rhone, J.,

— This is a rule to show cause why plaintiffs should not produce in advance of trial a written statement alleged to have been made by defendant while she was in the hospital recovering from an accident out of which this suit arises. The authority asserted to warrant the proceeding is the Act of February 27,1798,3 Sm. L. 303.

By consulting the petition for the rule it appears that the only reason assigned in support of her petition is, “that she made a written statement while in the hospital *450concerning the happening of the accident upon which this action is based”.

Plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yorkshire Worsted Mills v. National Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Cottrell v. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  3. Morgan v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API