Harlem Corporation v. Eadie
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
A majority of the Court is satisfied that the master has arrived at the just conclusion of this case and that his report should have been confirmed by the circuit Judge.
In addition to what he has said, we observe: The funds which were upon deposit with the South Carolina Loan & Trust Company to the credit of Mrs. Hibbett were deposited there for the purpose of investment, and prior to December 13, 1926, she was making insistent demands upon the bank that the fund be invested. The investment in the bond and mortgage in question was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte BergerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mortgage Loan Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- South Carolina State Bank, Rec'r v. StokesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933