Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Berger

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 3, 1908No. 7005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

September 3, 1908. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The record contains the following statement:

"After the Supreme Court of this State filed its opinion, in the case of Livingstain v. the Columbian Banking andTrust Co., 77 S.C. 305, 57 S.E., 182, the said Martin K. Berger filed his petition and affidavit, setting forth that he came within the exception, as recognized in said decision, and was entitled to subrogation, for that he obtained New York exchange, drawn on the National Bank of Commerce, for and in consideration of cash money paid into the bank. The defendant's receivers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Livingstain v. Columbian Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. McGregor v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Porter v. StrickerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. FantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Bradley, State Bank Examiner v. GuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Hampton Loan & Exchange Bank v. LightseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Henry v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Railway Express Agency v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API