Legal Opinion

Cole v. United States Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 13, 1994No. 93-8230PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The United States Department of Agriculture imposed monetary penalties on plaintiff-appellee Graham L. Cole, a tobacco dealer, under statutes and regulations governing the marketing of tobacco. After unsuccessfully challenging the penalties at the administrative level, Cole brought the present action in district court, eventually moving for summary judgment on the ground that the Secretary of Agriculture lacked specific statutory authority to impose a penalty for Cole’s conduct. The district court agreed and granted Cole’s motion. We are presented with an appeal from a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Frio Ice, S.A. v. Sunfruit, Inc., John R. Plana, Jr., Oswaldo P. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. C.T. Akins, Jay M. Fate, Michael Schroeder v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Chairman State Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graham L. Cole v. United States Department Of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API