Legal Opinion

Sentino v. Valerio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Cristobal F. Espinal and Aracenas Trans, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated June 9, 2009, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the grounds that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and that they were not at fault in the happening of the accident.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Page v. BelmonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Show Lain Cheng v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harsch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Pope v. Safety & Quality Plus, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Brabham v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Brabham v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API