Eckstein v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
On Application for Review of a Decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers. The decision in question affirmed the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York on merchandise imported by Albert Eckstein. Note G. A. 5,673, T. D. 25,296.
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
Paragraph 192, Schedule C, § 1, Tariff Act July 24, 1897,_c. 11, 30 Stat. 167 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1645], lays a duty on “zinc in blocks or pigs, one and one-half cents per pound; in sheets, two cents per pound,” and paragraph 193 on “articles or wares not specially provided for in this act, composed wholly or in part of iron, steel, lead, copper, nickel, pewter, zinc, gold, silver, platinum, aluminum or other metal, and whether partly or wholly manufactured, forty-five per centum ad valorem.” This importation‘is of zinc in sheets, nickel-plated, which have been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dejonge v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Langerman & Petty v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hirsch v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Baker Ice Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Kroder Reubel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- American Nickeloid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- United States v. American Nickeloid Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.