Legal Opinion

Arlington Auto Body Service v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1985No. Appeal, No. 1955 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

This is an appeal by the Arlington Auto Body Service (Employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision granting benefits to John Bosack, Jr. (Claimant).

Claimant was employed as a frame and body repairman in Employer’s body shop when, on October 5, 1979, another employee began painting in the same location, rather than in a separate painting booth where such work was normally performed. After three hours of exposure to the acrylic paint fumes, Claimant became ill and was forced to leave work early. Later that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hayden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Plasteel Products Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Crucible Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Asbestos Insulating Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leed v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Leed v. WCAB (QUAKER ALLOY CAST. CO.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API