Legal Opinion

Mancillas v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1976No. 1082PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

The primary question to be decided in this workmen’s compensation case is whether certain findings of the jury are in fatal conflict. We hold that they are not.

Judgment on the verdict was rendered by the trial court in favor of cross-plaintiff Lauro Mancillas against cross-defendant Texas Employers’ Insurance Association for workmen’s compensation benefits, plus medical expenses and interest. Mancillas, the employee, appeals from that judgment.

In answers to fourteen special issues the jury found: 1) that appellant received an accidental injury in the course of his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Producers Chemical Company v. McKayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Royal v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Grabes v. Reinhard Bohle MacHine Tools, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. Joseph's Wine Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Garcia v. Dependable Shell Core MacHines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  3. Naranjo v. CullCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. v. Alvarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  5. Texas General Indemnity Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API