Keller v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.
The nature of the controversy and the principles of law involved are set forth in that portion of Judge Reis’ opinion in which he said there was “presented a question of fact for the commission and, upon familiar principles, the commission’s finding must be sustained, if supported by any credible evidence or reasonable inference.”
Appellant was injured May 7, 1949,' in the course of his employment at the International Harvester Company. The injury occurred when he stepped down from a large fan in a crane to a four-wheel shop truck and then from the truck to the ground level. In reaching for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Giant Grip Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Sheehan v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Polzin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958