Duran v. Castro
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302, his application was referred to the magistrate judge who recommended that the application be denied. Petitioner, through counsel, has objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation. I consider petitioner’s objections on the pleadings and papers filed herein and without oral argument. 1 See Local Rule 78-230(h).
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On January 4, 1997, J.C. Penney…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.