Legal Opinion

Duran v. Castro

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 18, 2002No. CIV. S-00-305-LKKJFMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302, his application was referred to the magistrate judge who recommended that the application be denied. Petitioner, through counsel, has objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation. I consider petitioner’s objections on the pleadings and papers filed herein and without oral argument. 1 See Local Rule 78-230(h).

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 4, 1997, J.C. Penney…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API