Legal Opinion

Founders General Corp. v. Hoey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This action, equivalent to a demurrer, raises the question whether the facts alleged in the complaint disclose a transaction subject to the documentary stamp tax which was assessed and collected from the plaintiff under Schedule A (3) of section 800 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 USCA § 921 (b) (1). The facts alleged may be summarized as follows:

On September 10, 1929, plaintiff made a written agreement with an electric power corporation, hereinafter referred to as the issuing corporation, to subscribe at the price of $13.50 per share for 100,000 shares of the issuing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Shreveport-El Dorado Pipe Line Co. v. McGrawlCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States v. Brown Fence & Wire Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1935
  4. Westmoreland Coal Co. v. MacLaughlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. WillcutsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Founders General Corp. v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API