Legal Opinion

Johnson-Kendrick v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Norfolk County Circuit Court

Decided May 31, 1996No. Case No. (Law) L95-942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge John C. Morrison, Jr.

Defendants, Sears and Ruben Farless (collectively “Sears”), seek to have this court sustain their Demurrer to Count I of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Motion for Judgment arguing that they are not liable to plaintiff as a matter of law because defendant, James Brakebill, was not acting within the scope of his employment when he allegedly engaged in sexual misconduct with plaintiff. Sears also argues that plaintiff’s claims of wrongful discharge for sexual harassment and negligent retention should be dismissed because they allege causes of action which do not exist…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Womack v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  3. Russo v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. Commercial Business Systems, Inc. v. BellSouth Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  5. Fox v. DeeseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stottlemyer v. GhrammVirginia Circuit Court · 2001
  2. Berry v. Scott & StringfellowNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1998
  3. Hernandez v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 2011
  4. Millman v. SnyderFairfax County Circuit Court · 2004
  5. Cleaves-McClellan v. ShahHampton County Circuit Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API