Legal Opinion
Billington v. Village of Armington
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 15, 2012No. 10-3876PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Mildred Billington owned a mobile home in Armington, Illinois, a small village of 349 persons, but no one resided in the home. Instead, her daughter and son-in-*573law, who lived next door to the mobile home, used it as additional space.
At an Armington Village Board meeting on May 14, 2008, the Board discussed the situation of the unoccupied mobile home and its apparent violation of a village ordinance. Specifically, the presence of the mobile home appeared to violate Section 5-015, which limits mobile homes to those existing at the time, and as to those preexisting homes provides:
Existing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Geinosky v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Atkins v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thorncreek Apartments III, LLC v. Village of Park ForestDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Village of PlainfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Village of PlainfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Vázquez v. Village of BensenvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014