Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Callanen

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John R. Tenney, J.

Plaintiffs have brought this action against defendant attorneys for their alleged malpractice in failing to prosecute plaintiff’s claim against the third-party defendants. Defendant attorneys have brought a third-party action alleging they are entitled to contribution from the parties they neglected to sue in the first place.

The third-party defendants have moved to dismiss the third-*763party complaint on the grounds that a right of contribution does not exist. The motion is granted.

Contribution is allowed from a third party under CPLR 1401. (Dole v Dow Chem.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Taft v. Shaffer Trucking, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cherry Hill Manor Associates v. FaugnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Threlkeld v. Haskins Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. BlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Hoitt v. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. Hasbro Bradley, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API