Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1950No. 31796 and 31807PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

In each case the protestants contend that the applicant, the I. & S. Trucking, Inc., is not ‘ ‘ a proper person to whom to grant a permit, ’ ’ as provided in Section 614-109, G-eneral Code, and that the granting of the application is not consistent with the public interest and the declared policy of the state of Ohio.

The appellants and the appellee cite the cases of Bray v. Public Utilities Commission, 139 Ohio St., 409, 40 N. E. (2d), 666, and Jones v. Public Utilities Comission, 141 Ohio St., 237, 47 N. E. (2d), 780. In the first of these cases this court held:

“1. The primary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bray v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jones v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re G & B Anderson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API