Hardy v. . Mitchell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Peebles, J., at May Term, 1910, of Geeene. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Allen.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Tbis action was instituted to recover tbe amount of a note for $250, executed by tbe defendant to J. T. Canady, and indorsed by bim to R. C. Canady and by R. Gf. Canady to the plaintiffs.
Tbe plaintiffs allege that they purchased said note before it was due, aud that they are the holders thereof in due course.
The defendant alleges that the note was without consideration, and that the plaintiffs had notice of this infirmity at the time they bought it.
At May Term, 1910, of the Superior Court, the action came on for trial, and the following verdict was rendered by the jury:
“1. Was the note…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kornegay v. . KornegaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hardy v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Bank v. SherronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Bank v. . SherronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923