Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Tice v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1945No. 36,486PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an original action in mandamus wherein the plaintiffs ask us to order the state superintendent of public instruction to consent to the annexation of certain territory to a rural high-school district. We issued an alternative writ. The defendant filed a motion to quash. The cause was submitted on this motion. Such a motion is equivalent to a demurrer.

The action was originally brought in the name of Joint Rural High School District M & L No. 1. It should be noted that this *527district maintains a rural high school at Hunter, a town located…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Griffith v. MowrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Rosenstahl v. StoreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Davis-Wellcome Mortgage Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Board of Satanta Joint Rural High School District No. 2 v. Grant County Planning BoardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Perkins v. Lenora Rural High School Joint District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. 143rd Street Investors, L.L.C. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Griffith v. City of WalnutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API