Legal Opinion

Davis-Wellcome Mortgage Co. v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1925No. 26,486; No. 26,500PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.;

The Davis-Wellcome Mortgage Company, a domestic corporation, seeks by mandamus to require the defendants, the state and county taxing officers, to accept a statement it has tendered as *3a correct basis for taxation. The case is submitted upon a motion to quash the alternative writ.

There is submitted at the same time a similar application in behalf of Willis Norton & Co., a partnership engaged in business as manufacturers and merchants, to be determined also upon a motion to quash.

We are required to determine the effect of portions of these two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Savings Bank v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. City of Wichita v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Ranchmen's Trust Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pittman v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. State v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Bank of Miles City v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API