Legal Opinion

Tooz v. Tooz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1949No. File 7126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nuessle, Ch. J.

This action was brought pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 32-07, RCND 1943, to recover possession of personal property. The sheriff took possession of the property. Section 32-0703, RCND 1943. The defendant desired to repossess certain articles of it, to-wit: a tractor, a mower, a corn cultivator, and a truck, and having given a sufficient undertaking as required by Section 32-0706, RCND 1943, procured a redelivery thereof. Thereafter the plaintiff filed an amended complaint setting forth this action on the part of the defendant, alleging that the plaintiff as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Nahhas v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lunde v. IrishNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Northrup v. CrossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. GuerinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Mahanna v. Westland Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Mahanna v. Westland Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API