Cashin v. Murphy

For some years litigation has been pending between these parties, and the style of this case is not unfamiliar to this court. The case is here now upon the recusation motion of J. M. Cashin and his wife, who, at the January, 1924, term of the court, filed their separate motions alleging that Chancellor E. N. Thomas, the presiding chancellor of that county and district, was disqualified because of bias and prejudice. Without quoting all of the movants’ grievances against the chancellor, there is brought forward into this motion a similar motion which was made in 1922, which was overruled by…