Legal Opinion

State Bank of Texas v. Parabia

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 17, 2020No. 3:14-cv-03031Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STATE BANK OF TEXAS, Case No.: 14-cv-3031-L-KSC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. QUASH WRIT OF POSSESSION 14 SAM PARABIA, ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to quash writ of possession (doc. 18 no. 319). Plaintiff filed an opposition and Defendants replied. For the reasons stated 19 below, the motion is denied. 20 By order filed September 15, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff's motions for 21 summary adjudication against Defendant Citizens Business Bank and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Multani v. Witkin & NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. First Federal Bank of California v. FegenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API