Denver National Bank v. Von Brecht
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Moore
In this action the judgment of the trial court was, that the revocable inter vivos transfer attempted by the *103trust instrument before us, in its cumulative effect, was a testamentary disposition of property and accordingly invalid for the reason that it was not executed with the formalities required by law.
It is my opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed upon authority of the following decisions of this court: Barnes, et al. v. Spangler, 93 Colo. 254, 25 P. (2d) 732; Dunham v. Armitage, Adm’r., 97 Colo. 216, 48 P. (2d) 797; Smith, et al. v. Simmons, Adm’r., 99 Colo.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. HilliardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Urbancich v. JersinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Barnes v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Dunham v. ArmitageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Smith v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936