Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Armitage

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 15, 1935No. 13,685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

An action in forcible entry and detainer, by Armitage, as administrator, defendant in error, against Miss Dun-ham, plaintiff in error, who claimed title and right of possession pursuant to a writing at the hand of the administrator’s decedent. To judgment awarding possession to the administrator, error is assigned.

While determination of right of possession on a restricted ground would suffice for the purposes of estate administration, the character and effect of the instrument on which plaintiff in error relies, ultimately to control, would remain to vex. Counsel have stressed the importance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Exchange Nat. Bank of Colo. Springs v. SparkmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Denver National Bank v. Von BrechtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. First National Bank of Denver v. GroussmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Denver National Bank v. Von BrechtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Denver National Bank v. Von BrechtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API