State v. Fie
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Both defendants contend the trial court erred in submitting the conspiracy to commit larceny charges to the jury because defendants were never properly indicted for these crimes. The indictments in question are identical except for defendants’ name:
The Grand Jurors for the State upon their oath PRESENT, That [defendant], Mitchell, John Pakulski, Elliott Clifford Rowe III, Donna Rowe (now Porietis), David Chambers and others, late of the County of Haywood on the 17th day of September 1978, with force and arms, at and in the County aforesaid, did unlawfully, wilfully, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WorthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- In Re LineberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. SergakisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.