People v. Quinones
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The defendant and Scott Horne were taken into custody following an altercation in a jewelry exchange. At the trial, the People did not dispute defense counsel’s right pursuant to People v Rosario (9 NY2d 286), to review the police officer’s memo book and the report relating to Horne’s arrest. Although the People stated that they would have the officer return with these items, and now contend that he did, all the record shows is that the officer returned to the courthouse and turned over other materials but…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. ConsolazioNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. GallardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.