Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Teasley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 21, 1977No. 32235PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, Justice.

Purchasers of real estate sued for specific performance of a release provision contained in their deed to secure debt, for an injunction to prevent foreclosure, and for damages and attorney fees. Purchasers appeal from a summary judgment granted to the sellers and from denial of their own motion for summary judgment.

In 1973 purchasers bought real estate from sellers. Purchasers executed a deed to secure debt to sellers containing a release provision and a note for interest only in advance for 10 years. In 1975, before the annual interest payment became due, the promissory note…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First of Georgia Insurance v. JoseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Kirk v. First Georgia Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Wright v. Intercounty Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Honea v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Bower v. CERTAIN-TEED &C. CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Jordan v. FlyntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Dozier v. ShirleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Park Regency Partners, L.P. v. GruberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Mickel v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API