Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Andrew Hall v. Lorettann Gascard and Nikolas Gascard

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 22, 2019No. 16-cv-418-SMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Andrew Hall v. Case No. 16-cv-418-SM Opinion No.

2019 DNH 069

Lorettann Gascard and Nikolas Gascard O R D E R Plaintiff prevailed in this civil art fraud case, and he now seeks an award of reasonable attorney’s fees necessarily incurred in vindicating his rights. Defendants object. The plaintiff, Andrew Hall, bought a number of paintings directly from defendant Nikolas Gascard, and a few paintings from others that Nikolas put into the art market. Hall thought the paintings he bought were works by the late artist Leon Golub. He thought so…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Maguire v. Merrimack Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Frost v. COM'R, NEW HAMPSHIRE BANKING DEPT.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API