Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmace v. David R. Herndon

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 24, 2014No. 13-3898Published

1DissentHamilton, Circuit Judge

Petitioners are not entitled to any mandamus relief from the portion of the district court’s sanctions order requiring them to produce thirteen employees based in Germany for depositions in the United States. The writ is being misused here to obtain immediate appellate review of an interlocutory discovery sanction. The defendant-petitioners even admit as much. They have told us they filed for the writ because they were simply unwilling to annoy the district judge further by inviting an appealable contempt sanction.

On the merits, the defendant-petitioners have failed to show a clear and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API