Moore v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction, after a plea of guilty before a jury, is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment, imprisonment for five years.
The admission into evidence of appellant’s oral confession presents a serious question.
To be admissible an oral confession must meet the requirements of both Article 38.22, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). See Valerio v. State, 494 S.W.2d 892 (Tex.Cr.App. 1973); Butler v. State, 493 S.W.2d 190 (Tex.Cr.App. 1973); Burns v. State, 486 S.W.2d 310 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Herron v.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Phenix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Moon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.