Legal Opinion

Baugh Et Vir. v. McCallum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1940No. Appeal, 207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an action in trespass brought by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, against five defendants, for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by wife plaintiff as the result of an automobile accident. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was refused, whereupon this appeal was taken by them from the judgment entered on the verdict.

On April 26, 1937, about 11 p. m., wife plaintiff was a passenger in the front seat of her husband’s automobile which was being operated at the time by him in the city of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Fazio v. Pittsburgh Railways CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Silberstein v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Matthews v. DerencinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Welc v. PorterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Brandjord v. HopperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. MALONEY v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API