Florence Gin Co. v. City of Florence
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice (after stating the facts as above).
The decree sustaining the demurrer generally is to be referred to the demurrers to the bill as a whole. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 222 Ala. 155, 131 So. 14; Sandlin v. Anders, 210 Ala. 396, 98 So. 299; Oden v. King, 216 Ala. 504, 113 So. 609, 54 A. L. R. 1413; Kelly v. Carmichael, 217 Ala. 534, 117 So. 67; Wood v. Estes, 224 Ala. 140, 139 So. 331.
Where a bill, as here, sets up several distinct equities, if complainant is entitled to relief on one or more of same, a demurrer to the bill as a whole should not be sustained. Cases, supra.
T…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Wood v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Percoff v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- White v. ManassaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Barrow v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.