Legal Opinion
White v. McDonald Ford Tractor Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 6, 1971No. 3 Div. 478PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal requires an interpretation of Alabama’s Competitive Bid Law.
On October 19, 1970, the Division of Purchases and Stores of the Department of Finance issued an invitation to bid for sixty-five low center of gravity turf tractors with sleeve-type engines to be used by the Alabama Highway Department for mowing grass and brush from highway right-of-ways. The invitations, with specifications, were sent to 278 prospective bidders. Ten responses were received, including the bid by McDonald Ford Tractor Company, Inc., the appellee here. The bids…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Inge v. Board of Public Works of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Poyner v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Haden v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- West v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- TFT, Inc. v. WARNING SYSTEMS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- INTERN. TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Spring Hill Lighting & Supply Co. v. Square D Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. PenaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.