Legal Opinion

Shields v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2002No. ED 80134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Presiding Judge.

James Shields (hereinafter, “Movant”) appeals the motion court’s judgment dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief as untimely. Movant raises one point on appeal. Movant alleges that the motion court erred in dismissing his postconviction relief motion without granting him a hearing to produce evidence that his motion was either received and lodged by the Circuit Clerk’s office within the ninety-day time period as set out in the rule or would have been received and lodged but for the neglect or oversight of a third party. Movant claims…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. State v. LinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Cowans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swofford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Matchett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Trice v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Broom v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Belfield v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API