Legal Opinion

In re Bolduc

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 10, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This is a Dist/Mun. Cts. RAD.A, Rule 8A, appeal by respondent Helen Bolduc (“Bolduc”) of the denial of her motion to dismiss a G.L.c. 123, §7 petition for her commitment to McLean Hospital (“McLean”). The petition was filed in response to Ms. Bolduc’s G.L.c. 123, §11 three day notice of her intention to leave that mental health facility at which she had been retained on a conditional voluntary basis. The sole question raised by the motion to dismiss is whether Ms. Bolduc’s Health Care Proxy Agent ever had the authority to apply for the conditional voluntary hospital admission on Ms. Bolduc’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. HagbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Blake v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Acting Superintendent of Bournewood Hospital v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Mendonza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re EastmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API