Legal Opinion

Mendonza v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 14, 1996PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

In these cases we consider the constitutionality of G. L. c. 276, § 58A (1994 ed.),1 which allows a judge to detain, prior to trial, a person accused of certain crimes on the ground of that person’s dangerousness (preventive detention). In Aime v. Commonwealth, 414 Mass. 667, 668 (1992), we concluded that G. L. c. 276, § 58, as amended through St. 1992, c. 201, § 3, a predecessor to § 58A, violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. That earlier provision differed in several respects from the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142, id. at…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. WheltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. SineiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API