Mendonza v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.
In these cases we consider the constitutionality of G. L. c. 276, § 58A (1994 ed.),1 which allows a judge to detain, prior to trial, a person accused of certain crimes on the ground of that person’s dangerousness (preventive detention). In Aime v. Commonwealth, 414 Mass. 667, 668 (1992), we concluded that G. L. c. 276, § 58, as amended through St. 1992, c. 201, § 3, a predecessor to § 58A, violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. That earlier provision differed in several respects from the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142, id. at…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. WheltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. SineiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. KnappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.