Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Scott

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1930No. Motion No. 9000PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

The relator has presented a motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus requiring a district judge to certify his disqualification to try a pending cause to- the Governor, and the question is whether or not that motion should be granted.

The petition for mandamus with accompanying exhibits disclose the facts relied upon to authorize the issuance of the mandamus. On May 13, 1929, the relator entered into a contract with McLennan County with respect to compiling and securing data and information necessary or appropriate in enforcing the collection of delinquent State and county taxes. Among…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. PeacockTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Oak Cliff v. State Ex Rel. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Citt of Dallas v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Hubbard v. Hamilton CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Thornburgh v. City of TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Freedom Communications, Inc. v. CoronadoTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. In Re City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Pharr, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  5. Narro Warehouse, Inc. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API