Legal Opinion

Mercurio v. Hall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1924No. 11,783PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellee against appellants for damages. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee for $500 damages, upon which, after motion for a new trial was overruled, judgment was rendered. The error assigned and presented in this court is the action of the court in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial, in which appellants have specified ten errors. Appellee, with much merit, challenges appellants’ brief because of its failure to make reference to these errors, or to address any point or authority thereto, or to discuss the same. It must be conceded that appellants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herman v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Rotch v. LivingstonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  3. Block v. HaseltineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Underwood v. WaldronMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. Crucible Steel Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Litzelswope v. MitchellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Board of Com'rs of Vanderburgh Cty. v. JoeckelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Holding v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Duke Energy of Indiana, LLC v. City of Franklin, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Daviess-Martin County REMC v. MeadowsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API