Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 22, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

— Affirming.

In this action brought, by the appellant against the appellee to recover the amount of an accident insurance policy on the life of her husband of which she was. the beneficiary, the court, at the close of her case, peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the appellee, and she has appealed.

The policy sued on insured the life of Ed Bingham against loss effected solely and independently of all other causes by the happening of an external, violent, and purely accidental event. A subsequent clause in the policy provided that it did not cover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olson v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. RustinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Ging v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. BushCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Caledonian Insurance Company v. NaifehCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Vincennes Bridge Company v. PoulosCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Massachusetts Bonding Insurance Co. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API