Legal Opinion

Rogers v. McCauley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1876PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court of common pleas of Bamsey county, refusing a new trial, the action having been tried before Brill, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

In 1861 the defendant, John McCauley, was indebted to the plaintiff and Matthew Flood, who transferred his interest in the debt to plaintiff. The debt was put in judgment January 18, 1868, an execution afterwards issued, and was returned unsatisfied. After the debt accrued, and before the judgment, John McCauley bargained for and purchased from one Bullen one lot in St. Paul, at the price of $950.00, and on said purchase took from said Bullen a bond to the defendant Theresa, then and now his wife, conditioned to convey the lot to her. The entire consideration was paid by the defendant John.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nichols v. RandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  2. Clark v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Keith v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Morrison v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  5. Evans v. StaalleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API