Legal Opinion

Downey v. Chutehall Construction Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 18, 2012No. SUCV201002671APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

This action arises from a dispute between plaintiffs Christopher and Mairead Downey, defendant Chutehall Construction Co. Ltd. (Chutehall), and third-party defendant The Follett Company, Inc. (Follett), regarding the installation of a rubber roof system on the Downeys’ residence in 2005. Before the Court are each party’s motion for summary judgment and related motions to strike and to supplement the record. For reasons that will be explained, the Downeys’ and Chutehall’s summary judgment motions will be denied, and Follett’s motion will be allowed.

BACKGROUND

The summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Stone v. Essex County Newspapers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API